Navigating the Heart (Rate): Diving into Its Importance and Limitations in Endurance Training
When it comes to endurance training, monitoring your heart rate has long been considered a fundamental practice. It's a metric that provides valuable insights into your body's response to exercise (Internal Load), helping you (or your coach) optimize your training regimen. However, like any tool, heart rate comes with its own limitations that athletes should be aware of. In this post, we'll delve into both the significance and the constraints of using heart rate as a guide in endurance training.
The Importance of Heart Rate in Endurance Training
Individualized Intensity: Heart rate monitoring allows us to tailor your workouts to your individual fitness level. By setting your zones based on max or threshold heart rates, and staying within specific zones during workouts we can ensure that your training intensity is appropriate for your current fitness level, goals, amd preventing overexertion or undertraining.
Semi-Objective Progress Tracking: Tracking changes in your heart rate during workouts over time provides a quantifiable measure of progress. Gradual decreases in resting heart rate and improvements in heart rate recovery can indicate cardiovascular fitness gains. The key statement is "over time" as we will see later on heart rate can fluctuate substantially day to day.
Overtraining Prevention: Consistently elevated heart rates can indicate overtraining, allowing you to adjust your training load to avoid burnout and injury. Similarly, a chronically suppressed or unresponsive heart rate can indicate overtraining. By monitoring these fluctuations we can get a glimpse into how the body is handling the load.
Accessible: While this is not in the scientific realm, but it is just as important. Practically speaking measuring heart rate is the most accessible metric, aside from perceived exertion, to capture due to the affordability of heart rate monitors. Reliable chest strap monitors can be had for $40-$80. These will be just as accurate as $150 ones, just with fewer bells and whistles. While I can understand the hurdle of the cost of a power meter, in my opinion, there is no excuse to not get a heart rate monitor.
Lead out at Southeast Gravel’s Battle of Sumter Forest
Limitations of Heart Rate as a Training Metric
External Factors: Heart rate can be affected, fairly substantially, by external factors such as temperature, humidity, stress, altitude, and caffeine intake. These variables can lead to inconsistent readings, making it difficult to gauge your true effort level on heart rate alone. It is always contextual, which can make it a great cross-validation tool.
Individual Variability: Resting heart rates and maximal heart rates vary widely among individuals. Relying on generic formulas, think of the "220-your age" calculation, rarely result in setting correct zones. This can be minimized by working with a coach or following a proven protocol to test your max and threshold heart rates, but is still common.
Delayed Response: Heart rate responds relatively slowly to changes in exercise intensity. This lag can lead to underestimating your effort level during short bursts of intense activity or overestimating it during interval training. Heart rate shows the work that HAS been done, whereas power(link) shows the work being done.
Inaccurate Monitors: This one is completely avoidable, but is very common, especially among newer athletes. Please, please, please get a chest strap heart rate monitor! Do not rely on your watch, whoop, ring, etc... I get it, you already have it, you spent a lot of money on it, and the ads tell you how it good it is. There is a time and place for some of those, but it is not while actively training. The reality is that none of these are going to be anywhere close to as accurate as chest straps in capturing data, largely due to utilizing optical sensors vs. chest straps that actually measure the electrical activity of your heart.
Combining Metrics for Holistic Training
To mitigate the limitations of relying solely on heart rate, I highly encourage integrating other metrics into your training program. We will explore each of these in other posts. While you can absolutely do this on your own, working with a coach can help make sense of all the data, prevent analysis by paralysis, and help define actionable steps to begin improving. Some other metrics that are often used:
Perceived Exertion: Listening to your body and gauging how hard you feel you're working is a subjective yet valuable tool. It complements other data by providing real-time feedback on your effort level, and mental state among others.
Power Output: For cyclists (and some runners) power meters provide insights into the actual work you're producing regardless of all other factors. This objective data is then used to derive other metrics such as Functional Threshold Power(FTP), and/or Critical Power(CP).
GPS and Pace: Monitoring your pace in conjunction with heart rate helps account for variables like terrain changes and lets you adjust your training accordingly. This is particularly useful for runners, but not so much for cyclists.
Lab/Metabolic Testing: Through lab testing, and now also in the field(link), we can measure different systems through various tests resulting in metrics such as VO2max, VLamax, and Anaerobic Threshold.
Conclusion
Heart rate monitoring remains an essential tool in endurance training, offering insights into intensity, progress, and stress response. However, it's crucial to acknowledge its limitations, such as susceptibility to external factors and delayed response. By combining heart rate data with perceived exertion, power output, and other relevant metrics, we can develop a more comprehensive understanding of training and its effects. Remember that no single metric tells the whole story—successful endurance training involves a holistic approach that considers various factors to achieve optimal results. We will continue to explore other metrics, their strengths, their pitfalls, and how they can be used to help you get faster.